Overview
Mobius Governance Overview¶
Version: 1.0.0
Status: Canonical
Cycle: C-151
Core Invariants¶
Mobius governance is built on four invariants:
| Invariant | Description |
|---|---|
| Authority is proven, not narrated | All authority requires cryptographic proof |
| Power is time-bounded | Maximum 90-day authority grants, no exceptions |
| Meaning is attested | AI Companion provides epistemic verification |
| Roleplay is sandboxed | Imagination never crosses to execution |
No system mutation, consensus, or delegation may occur unless all authority gates pass.
Why This Design¶
This design prevents epistemic collapse, social engineering, and silent power accumulation in agentic systems.
Most agentic system failures stem from one confusion:
Mobius eliminates this confusion by architectural enforcement.
Authority Model¶
The Four Gates¶
Every privileged action must pass through four gates:
- Identity Gate (Ledger ID)
- Cryptographic identity verification
- Registered on Mobius Ledger
-
Verifiable history
-
Economic Gate (Wallet Stake)
- Locked stake / MIC
- Slashing risk accepted
-
Skin in the game
-
Epistemic Gate (Companion Attestation)
- EPICON-01 compliant justification
- Multi-anchor reasoning
-
Explicit boundaries and counterfactuals
-
Scope Gate (AVM Verification)
- RBAC/ABAC permissions
- Time-bounded (≤ 90 days)
- Risk classification
Governance Structure¶
Two-House Model¶
- Concord Council: Ethics, policy, anti-capture
- Technical Steering Committee (TSC): Kernel, reference implementations, releases
Working Groups¶
- Security
- Attestation
- Federation
- Education
Public RFCs¶
Required for: - Kernel changes - Attestation format changes - MII/MIC specification changes
Integrity Gates¶
Any live artifact must pass: - MII ≥ 0.95 - Signed CI attestation - Sentinel review (if applicable)
Consensus Flow¶
The canonical 90-day consensus flow:
Developer → Companion Attestation → AVM Verification → Ledger Proposal → Quorum Vote → Conditional Execution
Key properties: - All authority expires automatically - Drift triggers immediate revocation - Full audit trail maintained
Security Boundaries¶
Sandbox vs. Authority Layer¶
| Layer | Roleplay | Authority Claims | State Mutations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbox | ✅ Permitted | ❌ Not honored | ❌ Not allowed |
| Authority | ❌ Not valid | ✅ After verification | ✅ With audit |
Threat Protection¶
Mobius governance protects against:
| Threat | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| Authority Roleplay | AVM verification, sandbox containment |
| Context Smuggling | CCR validation, explicit boundaries |
| Preference Capture | EPICON-01 constraints, multi-anchor requirement |
| Permanent Power | 90-day expiration, automatic revocation |
| Identity Cosplay | Cryptographic proof, no verbal authority |
See: THREAT_MODEL_EPISTEMIC_ATTACKS.md
On-Chain Analogy: How Mobius Mirrors Blockchain Invariants¶
Mobius governance follows the same structural principles that make blockchains resilient—applied to authority instead of money.
Concept Mapping¶
| Blockchain Concept | Mobius Equivalent |
|---|---|
| Wallet Address | Ledger ID |
| Private Key | Wallet Signature |
| Transaction | Attested Action |
| Mempool | Pending Proposal |
| Block Inclusion | Consensus Approval |
| On-Chain History | Immutable Ledger Record |
| Whale Movement | Authority Divergence |
| Market Reaction | Community Revocation / Scope Collapse |
Key Parallel¶
Blockchains do not prevent large actors from acting.
They make actions visible, attributable, and irreversible.
Mobius does the same for governance: - No anonymous authority - No silent escalation - No retroactive justification
Critical Difference¶
| System | What It Tracks |
|---|---|
| Bitcoin | State change |
| Mobius | State change plus intent |
Every Mobius action is linked to: - a justification, - a scope, - a time limit, - and a responsible identity.
This allows the community to observe divergence in real time, not after harm occurs.
Design Principle¶
Transparency does not stop bad behavior.
It removes the advantage of surprise.
Mobius inherits this principle and extends it to coordination, governance, and collective decision-making.
See: Mobius Is Blockchain for Intent
Key Documents¶
| Document | Purpose | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Consensus Authority Flow | Full authority verification sequence | CONSENSUS_AUTH_FLOW.md |
| Roleplay Sandbox Rule | Hard boundary enforcement | ROLEPLAY_SANDBOX_RULE.md |
| AVM Specification | Authority Verification Module | AVM.md |
| Companion Attestation Schema | JSON Schema for attestations | companion_attestation.schema.json |
| EPICON-01 | Epistemic constraint specification | EPICON-01.md |
| EPICON-02 | Intent publication & divergence protocol | EPICON-02.md |
| Epistemic Threat Model | Security threat documentation | THREAT_MODEL_EPISTEMIC_ATTACKS.md |
| Blockchain for Intent Essay | Conceptual foundation | mobius_blockchain_for_intent.md |
Final Governance Axiom¶
Mobius systems do not trust stories.
They verify identity, stake, scope, and meaning — then expire authority automatically.
Document Control¶
Version History: - v1.0.0: Canonical governance overview (C-151)
License: Apache 2.0 + Ethical Addendum
"We heal as we walk." — Mobius Systems